Skip to content
← Back to candidates

2026 ELECTIONS / CANDIDATE PROFILE

NY-04 · House · Libertarian

Blay Tarnoff

Military, family and veteran policy record.

Independent candidate profile. Not authorized or endorsed by any candidate or campaign. Read the editorial disclaimer.

DIRECT FROM THE CAMPAIGN · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Military-community priorities

Candidate statement
About this response & our editorial approach

About this candidate response

DutyStation contacts candidates to ask whether and how they support service members, military families and veterans, and invites them to share their thoughts and priorities. We share their replies here in the candidate’s or campaign’s own words, with minor formatting for readability and correction of obvious spelling mistakes.

No endorsement in either direction. Publishing a reply does not mean DutyStation endorses the candidate. Replying does not mean the candidate or campaign endorses DutyStation.

DutyStation’s website summaries and policy assessments are labeled separately.

Organized by topic. Email greetings and sign-offs are omitted; campaign contact details appear alongside.

Government shutdown and cooperation

  • My support or opposition to a government shutdown would depend on the circumstances. I cannot answer that in advance.
  • However, I do believe that, irrespective of whether the government is shut down, contracts must be honored and it is not acceptable to allow people to suffer who have reasonably come to rely on government promises.
  • Service members agreed to sacrifice their time and risk their lives in return for certain pay, benefits and care. Those agreements must be honored, even during a government shutdown.

Quality of life: pay, healthcare, childcare, spouse employment and moves

  • Those are contractual matters, to be agreed upon at enlistment or reenlistment.
  • The military would have to explain to Congress what it needs to meet recruitment goals, and such needs would have to be balanced with what the government can afford, but whatever is offered must be honored.
  • Until that system is in place, I would support the provision of what service members reasonably expected upon enlistment.

Veterans’ care and healthcare reform

  • I would issue private medical insurance that could be used anywhere.
  • More generally, though, government involvement in civilian health care has produced a Byzantine monstrosity that bilks patients, doctors and taxpayers to benefit politically connected pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies and hospitals, which then help the politicians who support the monstrosity.
  • I would completely reform the health care system by eliminating all government involvement, which will restore competition and market pricing and result in vastly improved care at prices anyone can afford.

Military family housing

  • I would ensure that housing expectations are clearly spelled out as a contractual matter during recruitment.
  • For current residents, I would support safe, clean, reasonable accommodations.

First priorities and government’s role

  • The main focus of my campaign is to enact legislation that would outlaw socialism. I would honor the promises and agreements of the past, but reduce government to its constitutional limits.
  • The elimination of socialism will produce a booming economy, the likes of which has never been seen. It will spur innovation that will make the United States a power that will far surpass the rest of the world.
  • It will reduce the need for soldiers to risk their lives. It will make people proud to be American again.
  • The wealth that will be created will enable the government to meet its obligations to its service members, in addition to making it easy for service members and everyone else to enjoy a comfortable life with little effort, or to become wealthy with more.

Experience and guiding principles

  • I am an attorney and a computer systems designer. I have spent my life designing and building systems that are robust and do not fail.
  • As a libertarian scholar, I have also spent decades studying economics and the wealth-multiplying effects of protecting everyone’s rights to do whatever they can to improve their own lives, so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others, and to keep whatever they earn and multiply their wealth through voluntary trade.
  • Socialism elevates the group above the individual, which only helps the people who appoint themselves spokesmen of the group. There is no greater way to empower the lowliest individuals than to respect the absolute sovereignty of the individual. That is why the rich tend to be more in favor of socialism than the poor, in whose they name they declare their support for it.

ELECTION REFLECTIONS · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Looking ahead to Election Day

Election reflections

Brief answers to DutyStation’s questions about hope, America’s future, unity, the next generation and a closing message. The earlier policy answers and their received date remain above.

Hope heading into the election

  • Although I disagree with more of his positions than I agree with, I believe Donald Trump is the best President at least since George Washington, and I have hope that Americans will come to understand and appreciate the important lessons he has taught, and that that will lead to a truly free society.

Vision for America

  • Every individual sovereign

Bringing Americans together

  • Pride in the American experiment in self-government

The next generation

  • A government that never uses force against people who have not violated someone’s rights

Closing message to voters

  • Society is falling apart – the answer is not to abandon freedom, but to double down on it!

Policy review pending. The campaign statements are published above; independent assessment and official-record review remain separate.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH

DutyStation assessment

Campaign review and legislative review are separate. Campaign statements are not treated as delivered results or scored voting records.

Policy summary: potential benefits and tradeoffs

DutyStation analysis. The positions below are our summaries of the linked sources. Potential benefits and tradeoffs are our analysis, not the candidate’s own words or guaranteed outcomes. An evidence gap is not a negative finding.

Military & pay

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Military families

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Veterans

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Defense contracting

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Policy-alignment scores

Alignment with our published policy criteria, not a measure of patriotism or a recommendation on how to vote.

Military & pay

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Military families

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Veterans

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

How scores work, evidence requirements & limitations →

Selected official record

No official actions have yet been reviewed for this profile. This does not mean the candidate has no record. A challenger’s lack of congressional votes is not counted against them.

Explore congressional roll calls on Sailor Bob Civics ↗ · Policy news · All candidate profiles

Independence & editorial disclaimer

DutyStation publishes these profiles as independent editorial research. This page is not authorized, sponsored, approved or endorsed by any candidate, campaign or political party. Inclusion, campaign links and published responses do not constitute an endorsement by DutyStation, and a campaign’s participation does not mean it endorses our assessment.

DutyStation is not an official government, Department of Defense, military service or Department of Veterans Affairs publication. Names, images and links identify the subjects and sources; they do not imply affiliation or endorsement.

Policy summaries, potential benefits, tradeoffs and any scores are editorial assessments under our published methodology, not measures of patriotism or recommendations on how to vote. Forecasts are estimates, not guarantees. Missing information, an unpublished score or a campaign’s lack of response is not evidence of opposition to the military, military families or veterans.

Profiles may use AI-assisted research and summarization, which can contain errors. Coverage is incomplete and reflects the sources and review dates shown; positions and records can change. Check the linked original sources. Campaign statements and responses represent the campaign’s own claims, not independently verified outcomes. When published, responses will be attributed and distinguished from DutyStation’s analysis; providing a response does not confer editorial control.

For additions or factual corrections, email editor@dutystation.ai with the profile link, the disputed passage and supporting sources. DutyStation will review submissions and correct material where the evidence supports a change. External websites are controlled by their respective publishers.

YOUR PRIVACY

How cookies and storage work · Privacy Policy ↗