Skip to content
← Back to candidates

2026 ELECTIONS / CANDIDATE PROFILE

FL-14 · House · Libertarian

Brian Lambert

Military, family and veteran policy record.

Independent candidate profile. Not authorized or endorsed by any candidate or campaign. Read the editorial disclaimer.

DIRECT FROM THE CAMPAIGN · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Military-community priorities

Candidate statement
About this response & our editorial approach

About this candidate response

DutyStation contacts candidates to ask whether and how they support service members, military families and veterans, and invites them to share their thoughts and priorities. We share their replies here in the candidate’s or campaign’s own words, with minor formatting for readability and correction of obvious spelling mistakes.

No endorsement in either direction. Publishing a reply does not mean DutyStation endorses the candidate. Replying does not mean the candidate or campaign endorses DutyStation.

DutyStation’s website summaries and policy assessments are labeled separately.

Organized by topic. Email greetings and sign-offs are omitted; campaign contact details appear alongside.

Military service

  • I served 20 years in the U.S. Navy. I've lived the moves, the deployments, and the transition to civilian life. I've worked 18-hour days and earned peanuts for pay doing it, like so many who serve. I've also dealt with the VA as a veteran myself. That experience shapes everything I'd do on these issues.

Veterans’ records and care

  • My biggest concern with the VA is how it controls information. Too often veterans have to fight just to see their own records, understand why a claim was denied, or find out where it stands in the process.
  • The VA holds the information that decides a veteran's care and benefits, and it acts as the gatekeeper to that information.
  • That imbalance should not exist. A veteran should never need a lawyer or a service officer just to get access to their own file.

My first priorities

  • Give veterans full, timely access to their own medical and claims records, including the evidence and reasoning behind every decision.
  • Require clear, plain-language explanations for denials and delays, with real deadlines the VA has to meet.
  • Expand veterans' ability to get care outside the VA system when the VA can't deliver it in a reasonable time.
  • Hold VA leadership accountable when those standards aren't met.

Quality of life and housing

  • On quality of life, I know firsthand that service members work long hours for pay that doesn't reflect what's asked of them or their families. That needs to change.
  • On housing, the same principle of accountability applies. Service members and their families deserve transparency from the people and contractors responsible for their homes, pay, and care.

ELECTION REFLECTIONS · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Looking ahead to Election Day

Election reflections

Brief answers to DutyStation’s questions about hope, America’s future, unity, the next generation and a closing message. The earlier policy answers and their received date remain above.

Hope heading into the election

  • More voters than ever are tired of the 2-party gridlock and feel disconnected. Now there seem to be a real opening for alternative parties and candidates

Vision for America

  • Liberty, peace, accountability

Bringing Americans together

  • We agree on more than we think. Most of us want to be left alone to live our lives, raise our families, and keep what we earn.

The next generation

  • A country with more freedom and less debt than the one we were handed.

Closing message to voters

  • You don't have to settle for the lesser of two evils. Vote for what you believe in.

Policy review pending. The campaign statements are published above; independent assessment and official-record review remain separate.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH

DutyStation assessment

Campaign review and legislative review are separate. Campaign statements are not treated as delivered results or scored voting records.

Policy summary: potential benefits and tradeoffs

DutyStation analysis. The positions below are our summaries of the linked sources. Potential benefits and tradeoffs are our analysis, not the candidate’s own words or guaranteed outcomes. An evidence gap is not a negative finding.

Military & pay

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Military families

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Veterans

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Defense contracting

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Policy-alignment scores

Alignment with our published policy criteria, not a measure of patriotism or a recommendation on how to vote.

Military & pay

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Military families

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Veterans

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

How scores work, evidence requirements & limitations →

Selected official record

No official actions have yet been reviewed for this profile. This does not mean the candidate has no record. A challenger’s lack of congressional votes is not counted against them.

Explore congressional roll calls on Sailor Bob Civics ↗ · Policy news · All candidate profiles

Independence & editorial disclaimer

DutyStation publishes these profiles as independent editorial research. This page is not authorized, sponsored, approved or endorsed by any candidate, campaign or political party. Inclusion, campaign links and published responses do not constitute an endorsement by DutyStation, and a campaign’s participation does not mean it endorses our assessment.

DutyStation is not an official government, Department of Defense, military service or Department of Veterans Affairs publication. Names, images and links identify the subjects and sources; they do not imply affiliation or endorsement.

Policy summaries, potential benefits, tradeoffs and any scores are editorial assessments under our published methodology, not measures of patriotism or recommendations on how to vote. Forecasts are estimates, not guarantees. Missing information, an unpublished score or a campaign’s lack of response is not evidence of opposition to the military, military families or veterans.

Profiles may use AI-assisted research and summarization, which can contain errors. Coverage is incomplete and reflects the sources and review dates shown; positions and records can change. Check the linked original sources. Campaign statements and responses represent the campaign’s own claims, not independently verified outcomes. When published, responses will be attributed and distinguished from DutyStation’s analysis; providing a response does not confer editorial control.

For additions or factual corrections, email editor@dutystation.ai with the profile link, the disputed passage and supporting sources. DutyStation will review submissions and correct material where the evidence supports a change. External websites are controlled by their respective publishers.

YOUR PRIVACY

How cookies and storage work · Privacy Policy ↗