Skip to content
← Back to candidates

2026 ELECTIONS / CANDIDATE PROFILE

AZ-09 · House · Democratic

Dani Sterbinsky

Military, family and veteran policy record.

Independent candidate profile. Not authorized or endorsed by any candidate or campaign. Read the editorial disclaimer.

DIRECT FROM THE CAMPAIGN · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Military-community priorities

Candidate statement
About this response & our editorial approach

About this candidate response

DutyStation contacts candidates to ask whether and how they support service members, military families and veterans, and invites them to share their thoughts and priorities. We share their replies here in the candidate’s or campaign’s own words, with minor formatting for readability and correction of obvious spelling mistakes.

No endorsement in either direction. Publishing a reply does not mean DutyStation endorses the candidate. Replying does not mean the candidate or campaign endorses DutyStation.

DutyStation’s website summaries and policy assessments are labeled separately.

Organized by topic. Email greetings and sign-offs are omitted; campaign contact details appear alongside.

Military service and background

  • As a Navy veteran married to another Navy veteran, I appreciate the opportunity to talk about issues affecting service members, veterans, and their families. I served aboard the USS Bainbridge as an Operations Specialist, and that experience has stayed with me throughout my life.

Government shutdowns and cooperation

  • I do not support government shutdowns, regardless of which party controls Congress. Service members and their families shouldn't have to worry about whether they'll receive their next paycheck because elected officials can't agree on a budget.
  • I support an automatic continuing resolution to keep the government operating when Congress fails to pass appropriations on time. I would also work across party lines and with the administration to find reasonable solutions before a shutdown occurs.
  • If a shutdown does happen, protecting military pay, veterans' benefits, and access to healthcare should be immediate priorities. These are obligations our government has already made, and they shouldn't become bargaining chips in political negotiations.

Quality of life for military families

  • Military families make sacrifices that often go unnoticed. We ask service members to relocate, spend months away from their families, and be ready to serve at a moment's notice. The least we can do is make sure their families have some financial stability.
  • I support competitive military pay that keeps pace with the cost of living, affordable childcare, reliable healthcare, and better employment opportunities for military spouses.
  • As a working mom, I understand how difficult childcare costs can be. My own family has paid around $1,300 a month for childcare. For military families who relocate frequently, finding affordable care and rebuilding careers can be even more challenging.
  • My background in human resources and organizational psychology also shapes how I approach these issues. We need to look at military spouse employment, career portability, and the long-term financial impacts of frequent moves, not just what happens during active service.

Veterans’ healthcare and transition to civilian life

  • I'm particularly passionate about improving access to VA healthcare, especially in rural areas like much of Arizona's 9th District.
  • I support expanding VA services, improving mental health resources, reducing disability claims backlogs, and making sure eligible veterans can access private and community providers through the MISSION Act.
  • I also want to improve the transition from military service to civilian employment. Veterans leave the military with valuable skills, but translating those experiences into civilian careers isn't always straightforward. We should be doing more to connect veterans with employers, education, apprenticeships, and career opportunities.
  • I believe Congress needs to look beyond how much money we allocate to the VA and examine whether that funding is actually improving care, reducing wait times, and helping veterans navigate the system.

Military family housing

  • Safe and affordable housing should be a basic expectation for military families.
  • I have concerns about any situation where service members and their families are living in unsafe conditions or struggling to get necessary repairs completed. Families should have a clear process for reporting problems, timely maintenance, and a way to resolve complaints when housing providers aren't doing their jobs.
  • I believe stronger oversight and meaningful performance standards are important, particularly when private contractors are responsible for maintaining military housing. We need to know whether existing contracts and oversight are delivering acceptable living conditions before deciding what additional reforms are needed.
  • Housing affordability is already one of my campaign priorities, and I believe military families deserve that same attention.

First priorities

  • My first priorities would be protecting military pay and benefits from government shutdowns, improving access to healthcare, and addressing the financial pressures facing families.
  • I've continued working my full-time job throughout this campaign because I can't afford not to. My husband and I understand what it's like to balance work, raising a child, and paying the bills. That perspective, along with our military service, informs how I approach these issues.
  • I don't claim to have every answer, and there are areas of military housing policy and VA legislation that I want to research more thoroughly. But I believe good policymaking starts with listening to the people affected, examining the evidence, and making sure the solutions actually work.

Policy review pending. The campaign statements are published above; independent assessment and official-record review remain separate.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH

DutyStation assessment

Campaign review and legislative review are separate. Campaign statements are not treated as delivered results or scored voting records.

Policy summary: potential benefits and tradeoffs

DutyStation analysis. The positions below are our summaries of the linked sources. Potential benefits and tradeoffs are our analysis, not the candidate’s own words or guaranteed outcomes. An evidence gap is not a negative finding.

Military & pay

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Military families

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Veterans

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Defense contracting

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Policy-alignment scores

Alignment with our published policy criteria, not a measure of patriotism or a recommendation on how to vote.

Military & pay

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Military families

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Veterans

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

How scores work, evidence requirements & limitations →

Selected official record

No official actions have yet been reviewed for this profile. This does not mean the candidate has no record. A challenger’s lack of congressional votes is not counted against them.

Explore congressional roll calls on Sailor Bob Civics ↗ · Policy news · All candidate profiles

Independence & editorial disclaimer

DutyStation publishes these profiles as independent editorial research. This page is not authorized, sponsored, approved or endorsed by any candidate, campaign or political party. Inclusion, campaign links and published responses do not constitute an endorsement by DutyStation, and a campaign’s participation does not mean it endorses our assessment.

DutyStation is not an official government, Department of Defense, military service or Department of Veterans Affairs publication. Names, images and links identify the subjects and sources; they do not imply affiliation or endorsement.

Policy summaries, potential benefits, tradeoffs and any scores are editorial assessments under our published methodology, not measures of patriotism or recommendations on how to vote. Forecasts are estimates, not guarantees. Missing information, an unpublished score or a campaign’s lack of response is not evidence of opposition to the military, military families or veterans.

Profiles may use AI-assisted research and summarization, which can contain errors. Coverage is incomplete and reflects the sources and review dates shown; positions and records can change. Check the linked original sources. Campaign statements and responses represent the campaign’s own claims, not independently verified outcomes. When published, responses will be attributed and distinguished from DutyStation’s analysis; providing a response does not confer editorial control.

For additions or factual corrections, email editor@dutystation.ai with the profile link, the disputed passage and supporting sources. DutyStation will review submissions and correct material where the evidence supports a change. External websites are controlled by their respective publishers.

YOUR PRIVACY

How cookies and storage work · Privacy Policy ↗