Skip to content
← Back to candidates

2026 ELECTIONS / CANDIDATE PROFILE

VT-01 · House · Republican

Gerald Malloy

Military, family and veteran policy record.

Independent candidate profile. Not authorized or endorsed by any candidate or campaign. Read the editorial disclaimer.

DIRECT FROM THE CAMPAIGN · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Military-community priorities

Candidate statement
About this response & our editorial approach

About this candidate response

DutyStation contacts candidates to ask whether and how they support service members, military families and veterans, and invites them to share their thoughts and priorities. We share their replies here in the candidate’s or campaign’s own words, with minor formatting for readability and correction of obvious spelling mistakes.

No endorsement in either direction. Publishing a reply does not mean DutyStation endorses the candidate. Replying does not mean the candidate or campaign endorses DutyStation.

DutyStation’s website summaries and policy assessments are labeled separately.

Organized by topic. Email greetings and sign-offs are omitted; campaign contact details appear alongside.

Government shutdown and cooperation

  • I oppose a government shutdown in 2027. I served 22 years on active duty in the Army. Our service members must report for duty regardless of what happens in Washington, and Congress has a responsibility to ensure they are paid.
  • If Democrats control one or both chambers, I will work with them and the administration to pass responsible funding bills before the deadline. If more time is needed, I would support a short-term funding measure while negotiations continue. We can address spending and demand accountability while keeping government functioning.
  • If a shutdown occurs, I would support immediate legislation funding military pay and essential family services. I would protect advance funding for VA healthcare and benefits, and seek funding for services vulnerable to interruption, including transition assistance. My office would help affected families resolve problems and obtain clear answers. People who serve our country should never become bargaining chips.

Quality of life

  • As a retired Army officer, husband, and father of four, I understand that military service is a family commitment.
  • I support pay raises that keep pace with living costs, with particular attention to junior enlisted families. Housing allowances should reflect local rental costs. Military families need timely healthcare appointments, dependable mental health services, and continuity of care when they move.
  • I would prioritize affordable childcare with hours that accommodate military duties, including deployments and irregular schedules. I would also strengthen spouse employment opportunities and make professional license portability work in practice.
  • Frequent moves disrupt careers, schooling, and family finances. I would push for earlier orders whenever possible, prompt moving reimbursements, stronger oversight of moving contractors, and fewer unnecessary relocations when readiness permits. Taking care of families helps us retain experienced service members.

Veterans’ care

  • Veterans earned these benefits through service. They deserve timely appointments, clear answers, and follow-through.
  • I would strengthen VA staffing and hold leadership accountable for appointment delays. When eligible veterans cannot receive timely or reasonably accessible VA care, community care referrals should move promptly. In rural Vermont, transportation assistance, local providers, and telehealth can help bring care closer to home.
  • Mental health care must be available before someone reaches a crisis. I support faster access to counseling, substance-use treatment, suicide prevention services, and support for families.
  • For disability benefits, I would push for accurate decisions, shorter processing times, clearer explanations, and help obtaining service records. Veterans should not have to repeatedly prove information the government already possesses.
  • Transition planning should begin before separation, connecting service members with healthcare, benefits assistance, apprenticeships, education, housing, and employers who recognize military skills. My congressional office would make veterans’ casework a priority and follow cases through to resolution.

Family housing

  • No military family should have to accept mold, unsafe wiring, contaminated water, or repeated repair failures.
  • I would prioritize repairing existing military housing and adding homes where documented shortages exist. Housing allowances should better reflect local costs, and families facing housing delays need adequate temporary lodging support.
  • For government-owned and privatized housing, I support independent inspections, enforceable repair deadlines, and clear reporting of unresolved safety problems. Families need a complaint process that protects them from retaliation and provides access to an independent advocate.
  • I would strengthen enforcement of the military housing Tenant Bill of Rights and hold contractors accountable through payment incentives, penalties, and contract decisions. When a home is unsafe, families should receive suitable temporary housing while repairs are completed.
  • Safe, affordable housing is part of military readiness—and part of keeping our promise to those who serve.

Policy review pending. The campaign statements are published above; independent assessment and official-record review remain separate.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH

DutyStation assessment

Campaign review and legislative review are separate. Campaign statements are not treated as delivered results or scored voting records.

Policy summary: potential benefits and tradeoffs

DutyStation analysis. The positions below are our summaries of the linked sources. Potential benefits and tradeoffs are our analysis, not the candidate’s own words or guaranteed outcomes. An evidence gap is not a negative finding.

Military & pay

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Military families

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Veterans

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Defense contracting

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Policy-alignment scores

Alignment with our published policy criteria, not a measure of patriotism or a recommendation on how to vote.

Military & pay

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Military families

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Veterans

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

How scores work, evidence requirements & limitations →

Selected official record

No official actions have yet been reviewed for this profile. This does not mean the candidate has no record. A challenger’s lack of congressional votes is not counted against them.

Explore congressional roll calls on Sailor Bob Civics ↗ · Policy news · All candidate profiles

Independence & editorial disclaimer

DutyStation publishes these profiles as independent editorial research. This page is not authorized, sponsored, approved or endorsed by any candidate, campaign or political party. Inclusion, campaign links and published responses do not constitute an endorsement by DutyStation, and a campaign’s participation does not mean it endorses our assessment.

DutyStation is not an official government, Department of Defense, military service or Department of Veterans Affairs publication. Names, images and links identify the subjects and sources; they do not imply affiliation or endorsement.

Policy summaries, potential benefits, tradeoffs and any scores are editorial assessments under our published methodology, not measures of patriotism or recommendations on how to vote. Forecasts are estimates, not guarantees. Missing information, an unpublished score or a campaign’s lack of response is not evidence of opposition to the military, military families or veterans.

Profiles may use AI-assisted research and summarization, which can contain errors. Coverage is incomplete and reflects the sources and review dates shown; positions and records can change. Check the linked original sources. Campaign statements and responses represent the campaign’s own claims, not independently verified outcomes. When published, responses will be attributed and distinguished from DutyStation’s analysis; providing a response does not confer editorial control.

For additions or factual corrections, email editor@dutystation.ai with the profile link, the disputed passage and supporting sources. DutyStation will review submissions and correct material where the evidence supports a change. External websites are controlled by their respective publishers.

YOUR PRIVACY

How cookies and storage work · Privacy Policy ↗