Skip to content
← Back to candidates

2026 ELECTIONS / CANDIDATE PROFILE

MT-02 · House · Independent

Michael Eisenhauer

Military, family and veteran policy record.

Independent candidate profile. Not authorized or endorsed by any candidate or campaign. Read the editorial disclaimer.

DIRECT FROM THE CAMPAIGN · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Military-community priorities

Candidate statement
About this response & our editorial approach

About this candidate response

DutyStation contacts candidates to ask whether and how they support service members, military families and veterans, and invites them to share their thoughts and priorities. We share their replies here in the candidate’s or campaign’s own words, with minor formatting for readability and correction of obvious spelling mistakes.

No endorsement in either direction. Publishing a reply does not mean DutyStation endorses the candidate. Replying does not mean the candidate or campaign endorses DutyStation.

DutyStation’s website summaries and policy assessments are labeled separately.

Organized by topic. Email greetings and sign-offs are omitted; campaign contact details appear alongside.

Government shutdown and cooperation

  • I very strongly oppose any more Federal Government shutdowns >>> they represent a complete failure of Congress to address responsibly the issues of the day. Shutdowns are a game – and people get hurt – while Congressmen/women go on an additional “paid vacation”.
  • If there is a shutdown, Active Military pay should automatically be exempted. And If there is a shutdown >>> Congress should NOT be paid during that shutdown (and quite possibly not be entitled to back-pay once the government is re-opened).
  • I am running for office as an INDEPENDENT Candidate >> we need to restore civility in Congress, and work in a trilateral and tripartisan manner to actually get things done, rather than just fight about it and call each other names.

Quality of life

  • Our Servicemen and Servicewomen are NOT pawns. We must preserve, protect, and fund our all-volunteer force to maintain military effectiveness. Duty-station stabilization should be expanded (kids in high school, special needs of the family, etc).
  • Spouses should get MORE prioritization for available employment on base and in the surrounding communities.
  • In general, the number of moves should be reduced and standard rotation lengths should be prolonged .. this both stabilizes families, but also saves expense and maintains unit readiness.

Veterans’ care

  • I am a retired military physician >> I know what works, and does not work, in the VA Healthcare System. I look forward very much to taking an active role given this special perspective.
  • Our vets are entitled to improved mental health and medical care. This includes an increase in available Social Services.
  • The VA healthcare system should be fully funded, and not be facing (current) staff reductions.

Family housing

  • No servicemember, and especially those with families/dependents, should ever be asked to reside in unsafe military housing.
  • Simple fix >> if the housing is sub-standard or unsafe, additional stipends should be provided to pay for local off-base housing.
  • In the meantime, the military will then rapidly learn that it is cheaper in the long run to maintain appropriate on-base housing – simple economics.

ELECTION REFLECTIONS · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Looking ahead to Election Day

Election reflections

Brief answers to DutyStation’s questions about hope, America’s future, unity, the next generation and a closing message. The earlier policy answers and their received date remain above.

Hope heading into the election

  • As citizens cast their vote, I hope that they recognize that doing this is an act of ADVANCED CITIZENSHIP… and that rather than just voting a party-line ticket, that each person does the work to check out individual candidates and then choose those who match their own ideals and values most closely.

Vision for America

  • Prosperity, Family, Fairness

Bringing Americans together

  • Once every couple of years, we gather together to choose a path forward. Regardless of outcome, we should all remain engaged and support the winning candidate(s). There is no more room for anger, vitriol or violence in our political processes.

The next generation

  • Peace, Prosperity, Happiness.

Closing message to voters

  • Congress is broken – and the current two-party system is a large reason why. There are other alternatives out there, and there are more Veteran candidates running for office this year than in any other. And that’s because we care – we signed up for public service – and it is obligatory on all of us to together be “part of the solution – rather than be part of the problem”.

Policy review pending. The campaign statements are published above; independent assessment and official-record review remain separate.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH

DutyStation assessment

Campaign review and legislative review are separate. Campaign statements are not treated as delivered results or scored voting records.

Policy summary: potential benefits and tradeoffs

DutyStation analysis. The positions below are our summaries of the linked sources. Potential benefits and tradeoffs are our analysis, not the candidate’s own words or guaranteed outcomes. An evidence gap is not a negative finding.

Military & pay

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Military families

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Veterans

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Defense contracting

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Policy-alignment scores

Alignment with our published policy criteria, not a measure of patriotism or a recommendation on how to vote.

Military & pay

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Military families

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Veterans

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

How scores work, evidence requirements & limitations →

Selected official record

No official actions have yet been reviewed for this profile. This does not mean the candidate has no record. A challenger’s lack of congressional votes is not counted against them.

Explore congressional roll calls on Sailor Bob Civics ↗ · Policy news · All candidate profiles

Independence & editorial disclaimer

DutyStation publishes these profiles as independent editorial research. This page is not authorized, sponsored, approved or endorsed by any candidate, campaign or political party. Inclusion, campaign links and published responses do not constitute an endorsement by DutyStation, and a campaign’s participation does not mean it endorses our assessment.

DutyStation is not an official government, Department of Defense, military service or Department of Veterans Affairs publication. Names, images and links identify the subjects and sources; they do not imply affiliation or endorsement.

Policy summaries, potential benefits, tradeoffs and any scores are editorial assessments under our published methodology, not measures of patriotism or recommendations on how to vote. Forecasts are estimates, not guarantees. Missing information, an unpublished score or a campaign’s lack of response is not evidence of opposition to the military, military families or veterans.

Profiles may use AI-assisted research and summarization, which can contain errors. Coverage is incomplete and reflects the sources and review dates shown; positions and records can change. Check the linked original sources. Campaign statements and responses represent the campaign’s own claims, not independently verified outcomes. When published, responses will be attributed and distinguished from DutyStation’s analysis; providing a response does not confer editorial control.

For additions or factual corrections, email editor@dutystation.ai with the profile link, the disputed passage and supporting sources. DutyStation will review submissions and correct material where the evidence supports a change. External websites are controlled by their respective publishers.

YOUR PRIVACY

How cookies and storage work · Privacy Policy ↗