Skip to content
← Back to candidates

2026 ELECTIONS / CANDIDATE PROFILE

KY-06 · House · Write-in

Robert Quigley

Military, family and veteran policy record.

Independent candidate profile. Not authorized or endorsed by any candidate or campaign. Read the editorial disclaimer.

DIRECT FROM THE CAMPAIGN · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Military-community priorities

Candidate statement
About this response & our editorial approach

About this candidate response

DutyStation contacts candidates to ask whether and how they support service members, military families and veterans, and invites them to share their thoughts and priorities. We share their replies here in the candidate’s or campaign’s own words, with minor formatting for readability and correction of obvious spelling mistakes.

No endorsement in either direction. Publishing a reply does not mean DutyStation endorses the candidate. Replying does not mean the candidate or campaign endorses DutyStation.

DutyStation’s website summaries and policy assessments are labeled separately.

Organized by topic. Email greetings and sign-offs are omitted; campaign contact details appear alongside.

Government-shutdown follow-up received October 1, 2026. Robert Quigley asked that his earlier answers remain unchanged.

Government shutdown and cooperation

  • The simple answer is that I do not support a government shut down and pretty much oppose such an action in almost any situation. Shutting the government down is equivalent to locking yourself out of your home and car. It looks like something closer to insanity than a smart move. The only extreme situation I could really justify a government shut down is if there were some kind of natural catastrophe or war like type of activity which even in those cases is even more reason to keep the government open because after all the government is serving critical functions across the United States.
  • I would work with any administration to make sure the government is kept open and functioning properly simply because we cannot ask our Military to take a break, seniors to wait on their retirement checks or our patients to endure pain while they wait for medical treatment, etc.
  • The whole practice of shutting the government down makes absolutely no sense. Therefore, you can pretty much count on me to always vote to protect our citizens and specifically to protect our military personnel, their family and their dependents from serious life disruptions.
  • If we ask folks to serve in the defense and maintenance of America, then as Americans, we must make sure these folks are taken care of.

Earlier statement received September 27, 2026. The candidate’s original wording is retained below.

Military-family background

  • Note that I served in the Navy as a young boy with the rank and duties typically associated with the position of Military Brat or more politically correct Military Dependent. My dad Michael E Quigley started as an E1 worked as a flight engineer, earned his pilots wings in the 1960s and retired as a Lieutenant. Of course this is a joke but those 18 years gave me a lived experience that directly bares on your questions.

Use of military force

  • My general position regarding the use of our military resources is to use them sparingly and only when all else fails. Peace is achieved through force at this time in history but reaching for the military, continuing forever wars and asking those that serve to risk their lives for vague goals must be avoided at all cost.
  • As the saying goes it is better to get the foolish enemy to die for his country first before investing American blood and treasure.
  • Peace through strength works best when enemies pause to consider our overwhelming capabilities.

Family housing

  • Depending on the duty station I support the provision of housing allowances for each active duty member that covers the total average housing bills for that particular location and is equivalent to an average middle class lifestyle in the USA. This rule would cover most duty stations. The benefit will cover the whole family either state side or at other international duty stations.
  • Naturally there will be many duty stations that are remote and isolated. In these locations accommodations that equal a middle class living standard must be built and provided to our military personnel in place of the more robust housing allowance.
  • However, many deployments are going to be in war zones where rough living conditions like camping will be the only option.
  • The ultimate test is that folks willing to risk their life for America must be given quality housing.
  • Once folks separate from the military then they must be given full and complete access to all VA housing benefits and mortgages without any type of restriction whatsoever. Defaults are to be ignored. If the military guy and his family need housing then they get housed. No ifs ands or buts or maybes.
  • Nate that the Quigley Campaign proposes tweaking the FHA loan qualification rules so that a two year on-time rent history will make all borrowers eligible for a mortgage without regard to credit scores. We are short 5 million housing units and Quigley supports building small and tiny houses including ADUs to address the housing shortage.

Quality of life

  • Active duty pay must meet the national average excluding all minimum wage paychecks.
  • Full healthcare without cost must be provided to all members for life from the first day of service until death without exception. All departments must be covered until adulthood.
  • Raising the base level paycheck as mentioned should eliminate the need for a two income family and hence one spouse will be free to fully care for children and work if desired once kids goto school.
  • Overseas deployments must be kept shorter with rotations more frequent. As a young boy I saw my dad disappear for 6 months tours of duty aboard aircraft carriers. It wrecked many families and ended a high number of marriages. In today’s world a one or two month tour of duty is plenty.
  • Robert Quigley is a guy who puts a very high priority on strong families.

Veterans’ care

  • We need to educate more healthcare professionals for the VA and military generally. More service providers equals better healthcare.
  • Current disability benefits are currently set up to be hard to get. The simple answer is to grant such benefits on the advice of trained medical professionals. In other words, this is a medical question and not a law question.
  • We can’t make knee jerk war decisions then leave our heroes sleeping on the streets.
  • I am a firm believer in a strong economy that only comes from a large mom & pop entrepreneurial class. I will tweak the SBA to make it much easier to obtain government loans to start and build small businesses. The more individuals and families that are self supporting the stronger our society. Military veterans will be encouraged to take full advantage of these SBA programs.

Measuring success

  • Ultimately, I would judge the success of the suggested programs by the absence of homeless veterans, the absence of unemployed veterans and the number of veterans actively working in their communities across America.

ELECTION REFLECTIONS · IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Looking ahead to Election Day

Election reflections

Brief answers to DutyStation’s questions about hope, America’s future, unity, the next generation and a closing message. The earlier policy answers and their received date remain above.

Hope heading into the election

  • Americans are realizing the our two party duopoly political system is the country ending disaster George Washington warned us about 250 years ago. Our elected leaders must be for the folks in fact not just in words.

Vision for America

  • Non-stop economic development.

Bringing Americans together

  • Strong Independent centrist leaders, they are the strong magnet that pulls both extremes to the middle and Americans back together.

The next generation

  • We need to clean up the American system as well as the environment ASAP. I hope they inherit both a beautiful sustainable society and a healthy environment.

Closing message to voters

  • The status quo, or a new direction in our political world, your choice?

Policy review pending. The campaign statements are published above; independent assessment and official-record review remain separate.

INDEPENDENT RESEARCH

DutyStation assessment

Campaign review and legislative review are separate. Campaign statements are not treated as delivered results or scored voting records.

Policy summary: potential benefits and tradeoffs

DutyStation analysis. The positions below are our summaries of the linked sources. Potential benefits and tradeoffs are our analysis, not the candidate’s own words or guaranteed outcomes. An evidence gap is not a negative finding.

Military & pay

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Military families

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Veterans

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Defense contracting

No candidate-specific assessment has been completed for this topic. No position or impact is inferred.

Policy-alignment scores

Alignment with our published policy criteria, not a measure of patriotism or a recommendation on how to vote.

Military & pay

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Military families

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

Veterans

Not enough evidence

Selected official actions: 0 · Full scoring review incomplete

How scores work, evidence requirements & limitations →

Selected official record

No official actions have yet been reviewed for this profile. This does not mean the candidate has no record. A challenger’s lack of congressional votes is not counted against them.

Explore congressional roll calls on Sailor Bob Civics ↗ · Policy news · All candidate profiles

Independence & editorial disclaimer

DutyStation publishes these profiles as independent editorial research. This page is not authorized, sponsored, approved or endorsed by any candidate, campaign or political party. Inclusion, campaign links and published responses do not constitute an endorsement by DutyStation, and a campaign’s participation does not mean it endorses our assessment.

DutyStation is not an official government, Department of Defense, military service or Department of Veterans Affairs publication. Names, images and links identify the subjects and sources; they do not imply affiliation or endorsement.

Policy summaries, potential benefits, tradeoffs and any scores are editorial assessments under our published methodology, not measures of patriotism or recommendations on how to vote. Forecasts are estimates, not guarantees. Missing information, an unpublished score or a campaign’s lack of response is not evidence of opposition to the military, military families or veterans.

Profiles may use AI-assisted research and summarization, which can contain errors. Coverage is incomplete and reflects the sources and review dates shown; positions and records can change. Check the linked original sources. Campaign statements and responses represent the campaign’s own claims, not independently verified outcomes. When published, responses will be attributed and distinguished from DutyStation’s analysis; providing a response does not confer editorial control.

For additions or factual corrections, email editor@dutystation.ai with the profile link, the disputed passage and supporting sources. DutyStation will review submissions and correct material where the evidence supports a change. External websites are controlled by their respective publishers.

YOUR PRIVACY

How cookies and storage work · Privacy Policy ↗